Picture courtesy of Pixabay
One of my favourite shows growing up was Bill Cosby’s “Kids
say the darndest things”. Besides the fact that it left us all in stitches, it
was so refreshing to sit back and enjoy such forthright reasoning from the
innocent minds. Children do not belabor the point. They say it as it is to the
level of their comprehension.
The beauty of this innocence is that it carries through even
when they are unwell. Ruth was embarrassed when she walked into the consulting
room. Her daughter Mabel had just broken a toy in the reception while awaiting
to see the doctor. She was full of energy and curiosity and her hands were wet
from attempting to feed the fish in the fish tank in the reception.
Yet the night before, the whole family had not slept. Mabel
had been spiking fevers of 400C on and off, which were unresponsive
to paracetamol. Twice she had vomited the medication and the heaving left her
so weak. By morning, the fever had settled and Mabel had even managed to take a
few spoons of oatmeal before coming to the hospital.
Ruth felt like an imposter describing her daughter’s
condition. She did not realize that children are exactly like that. When the
illness weighs them down, they are listless and in a low mood. They get
glassy-eyed with fever or teary with pain. Immediately the discomfort settles,
albeit temporarily, they bounce back with amazing speed. One would be forgiven
for thinking they had imagined the whole affair.
A great paediatrician who taught me many years ago, ingrained
in me when I was a medical student, the importance of listening to the whole
story. He emphasized that the history of the illness is critical to arriving at
a diagnosis, even before one got down to examining the patient. This golden gem
of advice has served me well over the years. It taught me patience and I learnt
to pick important clues from distressed moms and dads.
However, examining a child is a whole other skillset! While
adults will lie down on the couch and cooperate without question, children
require the doctor to be extremely warm, attentive and highly creative. It is
said that one cannot make a good paediatrician if they genuinely do not love
children. Children turn even the sternest of professors into fuzzy, warm
beings.
Paediatrics rotation was my very first clinical rotation in
my fourth year of study. Our lecturers were diverse in nature but each had
their unique bag of tricks when handling the children. It was fascinating to
watch their interaction. During one of the teaching ward rounds, as the
lecturer was examining a five-year old child, he asked her to cough so he could
assess whether the increased pressure in the chest would make the neck veins
bulge abnormally. The child looked at him blankly and calmly stated that she
did not have an urge to cough. We all burst out laughing, much to the
bewilderment of the girl.
One hot afternoon, we stood around a nine-year old girl’s bed
learning about meningitis. As any medical doctor would tell you, examining the
central nervous system is one of the most difficult skills to acquire. The
little girl was extremely cooperative, even getting out of bed and walking in a
straight line. However, when it came to the past-pointing sign, she dug in her
heels. The doctor asked her to alternate between touching the tip of her nose
and the tip of her left index finger, which was held about foot away from her
face.
The good doctor even
went ahead to demonstrate but our little angel absolutely refused. When asked
why she didn’t want to do it, she bluntly stated that she did not want to look
as stupid as he looked. It was absolutely hilarious! None of us had thought just
how silly the action appeared because our perspective was purely medical.
Despite the moments of mirth that little children bring to
the wards, the bigger lesson remains that the art of medicine is heavily
dependent on social skills. A doctor can easily extract a diagnosis just by
listening and doing a thorough examination on the patient. Some of the
examining procedures may be unpleasant but they must be done and the findings
documented.
The wonder of being able to not only appreciate a heart murmur
but also characterize it, should not be allowed to lose its magic. The first
time I listened to the chest of an infant with bronchiolitis, I was awed. The
little boy sat calmly in his mother’s lap while his chest sounded like a
marching band. I totally understood why he would have trouble breastfeeding.
The cacophony in his chest was his airways struggling to get enough oxygen to
him despite being overrun by inflammation. It is not the same as just seeing
the abnormality on an X-ray film.
Unfortunately, this fine art is slowly being disregarded as
we become more and more reliant on technology. Patients are less satisfied when
the doctor fails to order a battery of lab tests or imaging diagnostics. The
results may be objective but their interpretation is subject to the patient’s
history and examination findings.
We must not allow the robotic culture of technology to
replace a good patient experience that can only be brought about by a good
conversation and a skilled examination. The ideal process dictates that
diagnostic tests are meant to confirm a diagnosis, not to go on a fishing
expedition.
Technology is here to assist us to decipher what is wrong
with our patients, not to turn us into lazy technology-obsessed antisocial
caregivers!
Post A Comment:
0 comments: