Science is interesting. You can bend it, you can stretch it
sideways, but facts are stubborn. They do not change.
When a patient is sick, a lot of diagnostic tests are carried
out as part of care. Some tests are done to pinpoint a diagnosis; others
evaluate the severity of the disease; others help to guide us in the best
treatment options; while others help us to evaluate the response to the
treatment given.
One Tuesday morning during our postgraduate training, during
a major ward round in the teaching hospital, a colleague went about the
business of the day. He presented a patient to the team who had been in the
ward for about five days. She was about 26 weeks pregnant and was with us because
she had a urinary tract infection.
By itself, that was no
news. Urinary tract infections are quite common in pregnancy. The pregnancy
hormones make the mother susceptible to the infections. In addition, the
growing uterus distorts the urinary system, leading to incomplete emptying of
the bladder when passing urine, further increasing this risk. It is one of the
more common reasons for admitting pregnant women in hospitals before delivery.
The dramatic news though, was when the doctor stated at the
end of his presentation, that the results of the urine test done revealed that
the bacteria responsible for the mayhem, was not responding to any of the
antibiotics we had in our arsenal! This test, which takes at least 72 hours to
give us results, is a painstaking process of isolating the offending bacteria
from the patient’s urine, growing it on a special plate with various
antibiotics and establishing which ones are capable of killing the bacteria and
which ones cannot cause it any harm.
The whole team in the ward round was perplexed. How do you
tell the patient that despite being in the wards in search of a cure, we knew
what was ailing her but did not have cure? We are not talking about cancer
here, we are talking about something as simple as a urinary tract infection. We
were stumped! All the antibiotics we were pumping into her were a waste of
time.
How do we end up here? Experts have warned us repeatedly that
we are consuming too much of antibiotics in our foods. The problem with this is
that the antibiotics reaching our system, having gone through animals, are of
variable doses. When bacteria are exposed to small amounts of antibiotics,
whose dose is inadequate to wipe them out, they have an opportunity to develop
resistance to these low doses. Eventually, when one needs to use the same
antibiotic to treat these same bacteria, they have developed thick skin and
will not be affected by the drug even in correct doses.
And then there is the cohort of patients who use antibiotics
indiscriminately even when they are not warranted. These are the patients who
get the influenza virus and refuse to leave the doctor’s consulting room
without an antibiotic prescription. Parents are the greatest proponents of
these bad practices when it comes to their children. So much so that a social media
joke was coined, targeting parents, stating that a fever is not a sign of
ceftriaxone (a potent injectable antibiotic) deficiency.
The other end of the spectrum has those patients who do not
follow their antibiotic prescriptions to the letter. Once the symptoms subside,
they never bother to complete the dose. They pose a danger, not only to
themselves but also to the entire public. They frustrate care providers to the
point of taking drastic measures to ensure compliance. This is how the Ministry
of Health ended up having two patients with tuberculosis incarcerated for
refusing to complete their treatment!
We must abide by prudent prescription practices if we do not
want to wake up in the next 20 years and find ourselves having converted
bacterial infections into terminal illnesses. We are all guilty. Doctors who do
not abide by good prescription practices, pharmacists who sell antibiotics
without a prescription from the doctor, patients who treat themselves by
demanding unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions or buying these drugs across the
counter from unscrupulous pharmacies, and farmers who pump their far, animals
with unnecessary antibiotics to increase their yield at the expense of all of
us.
What we fail to comprehend as a society is that antibiotic
resistance does not affect only those abusing these important drugs. It affects
all of us directly. The same bacteria causing pneumonia in one patient is the
same one causing meningitis in another, while it is still the same one causing
a urinary tract infection in the yet another. Once the patient with pneumonia
is improperly treated and an antibiotic resistance develops, the resistant
bacteria moves into the next victim and causes chaos in a different body system
with equal vengeance.
It is also worth noting that once an antibiotic enters the
body, it is not only going to treat the affected system. It travels all over
the body and kills off all other bacteria present and responsive to it. It
behaves like a terrorist attacking a mall. Despite having a specific target in
mind, he will leave hundreds of casualties behind as collateral damage.
The antibiotic journey started Alexander Fleming in 1928,
with his discovery of penicillin. If he were to wake up today, he will be
extremely proud of the advances that have stemmed out of his discovery.
However, he will probably have apoplexy at the thought that such a major
discovery that has had such a dramatic impact on humankind, is about to be declared
obsolete in less than a century.
This acceleration towards gross antibiotic resistance needs
to be brought to a screeching halt. We must all understand that antibiotics are
not sweets to be dished out like a cheap dessert with every meal. We must
reverse the trend or perish!
Post A Comment:
0 comments: