Picture courtesy KNH website
The past one year has been a bitter-sweet one for Kenyatta
National Hospital. It has been peppered with great news that put it on the map
in the delicate world of medicine with the separation of the three-year old Siamese
twins last year and the delicate re-attachment of a severed hand heralding the
start of 2018.
However, 2018 has brought more negative news than ever
before. Kenyatta National Hospital has been haunted by accusations of rape of
mothers with babies in the newborn unit, stealing of a baby from a mother
within its premises and most recently, wrongful brain surgery. The woes are
never-ending.
In the wake of things, the public outrage has been fast and
furious. On both mainstream media and social media, the institution has taken a
serious battering. Top management has been sent on leave and the Board of the
institution has made terse statements indicating their displeasure at the turn
of events.
The doctors have vocally come out to try and explain the
scenario of what really goes on behind closed gates but the public can only
read one thing, that they are defending their own. To this end, the institution
is currently crippled as the doctors have withdrawn their services until the
systemic issues in Kenyatta are addressed.
So, where is Kenyatta National Hospital coming from? Kenyatta
National Hospital is 117 years old, having opened its doors in 1901 to the
general public. It was named the Native Civil Hospital, designated to take care
of the Kenyan people during the colonial era. The European Hospital, currently
named Nairobi Hospital across the street was the white equivalent, providing
service to the white settlers.
The Native Civil Hospital went operational with a mere 40
beds, undergoing sustained metamorphosis to the King George VI Hospital in 1952
and eventually to Kenyatta National Hospital after independence. The 40 bed
hospital has expanded to an 1800 bed super-specialty hospital with multiple
departments.
The growth of this institution automatically resulted in it
bearing multiple responsibilities. It houses many other health departments
within its 47 acres, which have been domiciled there for ease of operations. It
is the leading teaching institution for health –related courses in Kenya, from
the University of Nairobi, to The Kenya Medical Training College, to several
other newer institutions that have come on board over the last few decades. It
is a centre for medical research and innovation.
All these roles are separate from its core function of
providing medical care to the 40 million Kenyans who have depended on since its
inception. From common ailments such as respiratory infections, malaria,
diarrhoreal diseases in children, and acute surgical emergencies, to complex
conditions required specialized care such as cancer, complex surgery, rare
infectious diseases, HIV care, severe burns and complex eye, ear, nose and
throat diseases.
For such an important institution, what ails Kenyatta
National Hospital? Like most other public entities in Kenya that have been
forced to undergo rapid growth to meet the needs of the public, lack of proper
planning is the biggest challenge.
The planning of the main hospital infrastructure was
extremely well designed. What is popularly known as the tower block in Kenyatta
is a work of art. The architecture is marvelous. The symmetry and functionality
are in place, a whole second level is designated for emergency evacuation with
extra exits and ramps and several lifts designed for different functions. The
out-patient clinics are all arranged along two corridors outside of the main
in-patient complex for efficiency.
However, over the years, the number of patients requiring
care at the institution has far outweighed the resources. For this reason, many
practices have been entrenched in the running of the institution without
questioning their validity and effectiveness.
One such area is in human resource. For an 1800 bed facility
that is usually forced to carry almost twice its capacity, the number of
clinical staff employed by the hospital is grossly inadequate. The reason this
has not been obvious for decades is because, by virtue of being a teaching
hospital, a lot of the work in the clinical areas has been borne by the
training students, some who may be forced to bite more than they can chew due
to necessity. The existing memoranda of association between the hospital and
teaching institutions cannot replace the much-needed human resource. The ties
back to the Ministry of Health are also oppressive. For instance, since the
Ministry is directly responsible for management of the payroll of the hospital,
it means that if it does not think it is important to employ more staff, the
hospital cannot change that.
The chronic underfunding of the institution and corruption
that bites into a chunk of the meagre budgetary allocation leaves the
institution on its belly. For this reason, it is impossible to procure
equipment in a timely fashion to sustain the pressure to keep up with the need
to improve services. It is also impossible to train staff to keep up with the
new technologies in a timely fashion.
Leadership and governance has been a long-standing problem in
the institution. The top leadership of the hospital has for years been viewed
as a political reward. For this reason, most of the people who have held the
docket of the top job have their hands tied when it comes to trying to streamline
the institution and route out the rampant corruption entrenched at various
levels. Some have bullets lodged in the spine for their efforts.
For a hospital, clinical management is a core function in
ensuring patient safety and must be completely delinked from politics. The
professionals who provide medical care are the ones who understand their job,
how to regulate themselves, set up standard operating procedures and develop
protocols on patient safety. They must be free to do this within a setting
where there is no fear, intimidation or interference. The team leaders must be
answerable to their patients first!
However, when politics comes in to cause knee-jerk reactions
that intimidate office holders, the result is an institution with weak
leadership because those best qualified to lead prefer to avoid the political
drama. Let us clean up the mess that’s glaring at us and restore this institution
to its glory!
Post A Comment:
0 comments: